The analysis revealed that the relationship amongst the linear combinations out of the 2 sets of details you are going to most useful end up being informed me by you to sort out good Rc property value
Towards PSPP, five things emerged, recognized as physical worry about-worthy of, activities competence, shape, bodily strength, and glamorous human body that have eigenvalues of just one.78, 4.34, step 3.59, 3.46, and 6.08 correspondingly bookkeeping to have 64% of your difference one of the things. In contrast to the fresh new suggested hierarchical model (Fox Corbin, 1989), yet not, this new actual notice-worthy of size and glamorous human body subscale shown big basis overlap and you may was basically then deleted of further investigation. That it grounds overlap between your attractive system and you can bodily worry about-really worth scales might have been claimed in other places (Sonstroem et al., 1992). The remaining three subscales regarding real mind-thinking taken into account 38% of the type throughout the survey things. Cronbach (1951) alphas of these subscales was indeed .ninety getting recreations ability (six issues), .86 getting physical condition (6 factors), and you may .85 to own physical energy (six points).
The fresh new POSQ and additionally presented a clear basis construction for interpretation. One or two products came up that have eigenvalues more than step one.00 and you can were recognized as activity (six facts) and you can pride orientation (6 factors) for get it done, accounting for 34% and you may 21% of your own difference in participants’ responses, respectively. The interfactor correlation is actually minimal (roentgen = .04), in keeping with previous browse (Appreciate Roberts, 1994; Roberts Treasure 1995) verifying orthogonality of these two activities. Alpha coefficients have been .71 and https://datingranking.net/cs/together2night-recenze you can .ninety for the job and you will ego direction to own get it done subscales, correspondingly.
So you’re able to look at the multivariate relationship between the linear combination of the two sets of parameters consisting of physical worry about-perceptions/mission orientations to possess take action, and indicator out of intrinsic inspiration to own take action, canonical correlation was performed
The fresh new IMI also demonstrated a steady basis design while the every facts loaded on the particular circumstances appointment the minimum traditional getting chosen having translation. Eigenvalues was basically higher than step 1.00 into appeal/exhilaration (5 facts), seen proficiency (cuatro products), effort/pros (5 activities), and you may pressure/pressure (4 items) intrinsic inspiration subscales, correspondingly, bookkeeping to own sixty.1% of difference on the factors. Inner reliability coefficients were .82 (interest/enjoyment), .77 (imagined ability), .76 (effort/ importance), and you may .77 (tension/ pressure) for the built-in determination getting take action subscales.
Means and you will standard deviations of physical notice-perception (PSPP), task and you can pride orientations to possess exercise (POSQ), and you can built-in inspiration to possess exercise (IMI) subscales is actually demonstrated into the Dining table step 1. High no purchase correlations (2-tailed) were observed ranging from activity direction to have get it done and one another notice/excitement (r .29), and energy/pros (r = .36). Self-thinking out-of shape was relevant to interest/exhilaration (r = .49), thought of competence (r .59), effort/advantages (r = .49), and pressure/tension (r = -.27).
The predictor details was basically consisting of self-thinking regarding sports skills, health, and you may bodily fuel, including task and you can pride orientations having get it done. New traditional details consisted of the fresh new four steps out of intrinsic inspiration having exercise, specifically, interest/thrills, detected proficiency, effort/pros, and pressure/stress.
74, F(4, 252) = ,p <.0001). Follow-up canonical correlation analysis indicated three significant functions emerged. However, only the first function exceeded the .30 criterion (10% of the variance) suggested as the minimal level for meaningful interpretation (Tabachnick Fidell, 1989). 68 ([R.sup.2]= .46). A minimal canonical loading of .30 is considered to contribute significantly to the multivariate relationship (Pedhazur, 1982). As Table 2 demonstrates, a high positive loading on physical condition, and moderately positive loadings on task orientation for exercise, sports competence, and physical strength, were positively associated to the criterion set of variables composed of interest/ enjoyment, perceived competence, and effort/importance, and were negatively relat ed to tension/pressure for exercise. Ego orientation for exercise, however, failed to significantly contribute to the multivariate relationship. The redundancy index revealed that 16% of the variance in the four indices of intrinsic motivation for exercise could be explained by the linear combination of the predictor variables. A redundancy value of 10% is recommended as a significant and meaningful cutoff for interpretation (Pedhazur, 1982).